It's a BIG if, that the comparisons were done with same details settings etc, but IF so, then this is a great first attempt mainstream SKU. This on the other hand is more impressive. Keith12 said:This is getting interesting now! The entry level A380 seemed a little lackluster, but IMO, decent for what is a first discreet GPU on the low end from Intel (Cough.Larrabee!) That shows Intel is willing to be aggressive on pricing, but the clock is definitely ticking with Nvidia Ada and AMD RDNA 3 slated to launch later this year. The Arc A380, meanwhile, is supposed to have a $129–$139 MSRP when it arrives in the US, hopefully by next month. That's effectively a price ceiling for the Arc A750 in our minds, at least if Intel wants gamers to show interest. The RX 6650 XT outperformed the RTX 3060 by 15% at 1080p ultra in our GPU testing, and you can currently find the Radeon RX 6650 XT for $349. On paper, that should at least put it in the same performance realm as the RTX 3060, which would also put it into direct competition with the Radeon RX 6650 XT.Īssuming Intel can get performance in most games up to a similar level shown in this video, it could be a welcome addition to the desktop market if it comes priced accordingly. Intel hasn't detailed the official specs for all the Arc desktop GPUs it plans to launch, but we expect the A750 will have 24 Xe cores and 3072 GPU shaders, with 12GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, probably clocking in the 2.0–2.3GHz range. Intel Arc Alchemist Rumored Specifications Graphics Card The RTX 3060 only has 28 RT cores, but those are Nvidia's second-generation RT cores and we still don't know how those compare to Intel's RTUs. The maximum number of RTUs (Ray Tracing Units) for Arc A-series graphics cards is 32, and the A750 likely has 24. We'd really love to see some ray tracing benchmarks for Arc, if only to satisfy our own curiosity. None of Intel's benchmarks used ray tracing effects, despite Control, Cyberpunk 2077, and Fortnite supporting DXR (DirectX Raytracing). Things have improved, but there's still plenty of work to do. While AMD and Nvidia have optimized their drivers for many games over the past couple of decades, Intel's integrated graphics drivers often felt like an afterthought. We know from independent testing of the Arc A380 desktop GPU that drivers for Arc are still developing, with performance that can vary greatly between games. Of course, these are Intel's own benchmarks in a handful of games. That's a pretty good showing for a graphics card that we hope will cost somewhere in the $300–$350 range. All of that basically agrees with Intel's numbers, but the more important bit is how the Arc A750 stacks up.Īcross the five games, Intel's GPU delivered 13% higher performance on average (geometric mean), with a lead ranging from 6% in Fortnite to as much as 17% in F1 2021. It can easily handle 1080p at maxed-out settings in most games, and 1440p at high quality should typically deliver 60 fps or more. The GeForce RTX 3060 is no slouch when it comes to gaming performance. Intel's Arc A750 Benchmarks at 2560x1440 High Game
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |